I think that my second peer review experience went better than the first time. I think I was more confident and better knew what to look for when reading the paper. Although the paper I read did not have any big components missing, I felt like I could praise the person instead of not leaving any comments. I felt too that I could leave more direct feedback such as saying how a certain element helped connect the main idea to the claim and pointing out areas that need more detail. Overall, I think my peer editing skills have improved since the first peer editing.